{"id":4133,"date":"2025-12-31T16:43:25","date_gmt":"2025-12-31T13:43:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/danil-hristich.com\/?p=4133"},"modified":"2026-05-28T10:57:00","modified_gmt":"2026-05-28T07:57:00","slug":"lmaa-small-claims-procedure","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/danil-hristich.com\/en\/lmaa-small-claims-procedure\/","title":{"rendered":"LMAA Small Claims Procedure"},"content":{"rendered":"<div id=\"ez-toc-container\" class=\"ez-toc-v2_0_71 counter-hierarchy ez-toc-counter ez-toc-transparent ez-toc-container-direction\">\n<div class=\"ez-toc-title-container\">\n<p class=\"ez-toc-title\" style=\"cursor:inherit\">\u0421\u043e\u0434\u0435\u0440\u0436\u0430\u043d\u0438\u0435<\/p>\n<span class=\"ez-toc-title-toggle\"><\/span><\/div>\n<nav><ul class='ez-toc-list ez-toc-list-level-1 ' ><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-1\" href=\"https:\/\/danil-hristich.com\/en\/lmaa-small-claims-procedure\/#When_the_LMAA_Small_Claims_Procedure_applies\" title=\"When the LMAA Small Claims Procedure applies\">When the LMAA Small Claims Procedure applies<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-2\" href=\"https:\/\/danil-hristich.com\/en\/lmaa-small-claims-procedure\/#Appointment_of_the_arbitrator\" title=\"Appointment of the arbitrator\">Appointment of the arbitrator<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-3\" href=\"https:\/\/danil-hristich.com\/en\/lmaa-small-claims-procedure\/#Costs_of_LMAA_Small_Claims_Arbitration\" title=\"Costs of LMAA Small Claims Arbitration\">Costs of LMAA Small Claims Arbitration<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-4\" href=\"https:\/\/danil-hristich.com\/en\/lmaa-small-claims-procedure\/#Steps_in_LMAA_Small_Claims_Procedure_and_time_limits\" title=\"Steps in LMAA Small Claims Procedure and time limits\">Steps in LMAA Small Claims Procedure and time limits<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-5\" href=\"https:\/\/danil-hristich.com\/en\/lmaa-small-claims-procedure\/#Hearings_and_evidence\" title=\"Hearings and evidence\">Hearings and evidence<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-6\" href=\"https:\/\/danil-hristich.com\/en\/lmaa-small-claims-procedure\/#Decision_and_avenues_for_challenge\" title=\"Decision and avenues for challenge\">Decision and avenues for challenge<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-7\" href=\"https:\/\/danil-hristich.com\/en\/lmaa-small-claims-procedure\/#Flexibility_and_moving_to_other_rules\" title=\"Flexibility and moving to other rules\">Flexibility and moving to other rules<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-8\" href=\"https:\/\/danil-hristich.com\/en\/lmaa-small-claims-procedure\/#Observations_and_practical_tips\" title=\"Observations and practical tips\">Observations and practical tips<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-9\" href=\"https:\/\/danil-hristich.com\/en\/lmaa-small-claims-procedure\/#Conclusion\" title=\"Conclusion\">Conclusion<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/nav><\/div>\n\n<p>The London Maritime Arbitrators Association (LMAA) has developed several frameworks to resolve maritime disputes. Its flagship LMAA Terms provide a comprehensive set of rules for large and technically complex cases. The Intermediate Claims Procedure (ICP) fills the gap for claims up to around USD 400\u202f000, while the <a href=\"https:\/\/lmaa.london\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/LMAA-Small-Claims-Procedure-2021.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Small Claims Procedure (SCP)<\/a> is designed to handle more modest cases quickly and economically. This article concentrates on the SCP, reviewing when it applies, how arbitrators are appointed, the costs involved, the procedural steps, and its broader advantages and disadvantages.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-group has-pale-cyan-blue-background-color has-background\"><div class=\"wp-block-group__inner-container is-layout-constrained wp-block-group-is-layout-constrained\">\n<p style=\"margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0.4rem;font-size:1.25rem\"><strong>\ud83d\udcd5 Free 25-page practitioner&#8217;s guide \u2014 LMAA Small Claims Procedure 2021<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p style=\"margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0.6rem\">A printable PDF covering scope, the 14\/28\/21-day timetable, word limits, the \u00a35,000 arbitrator&#8217;s fee, the \u00a36,000\/\u00a37,000 recoverable-costs cap, the \u00a768 appeal route, and nine practical tips for running or defending an SCP reference. Written for shipowners, charterers, commodity traders, and the P&amp;I claims handlers and counsel who live with their disputes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p style=\"margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0\"><strong>\u2192 <a href=\"https:\/\/danil-hristich.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/LMAA-Small-Claims-Procedure-Practitioners-Guide-2026.pdf\" download>Download the guide (PDF, 196 KB)<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"When_the_LMAA_Small_Claims_Procedure_applies\"><\/span>When the LMAA Small Claims Procedure applies<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>The simplified process is available only when the contract says so. A generic clause referring to \u201cLMAA arbitration\u201d will automatically lead to the full LMAA Terms unless the parties stipulate that minor disputes will be handled under the Small Claims Procedure. To minimise uncertainty, the Association suggests <a href=\"https:\/\/lmaa.london\/arbitration-clauses\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">model wording<\/a> for charterparties and other contracts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>By adjusting the arbitration clause, the parties can extend the SCP to disputes of any size. If the clause is silent, the procedure is reserved for cases where each side\u2019s demand or cross\u2011demand falls below about USD&nbsp;100&nbsp;000. This ceiling does not include interest or legal costs unless the parties decide otherwise. Should a cross\u2011claim exceed the ceiling, either party has roughly two weeks to request that the matter proceed under the regular LMAA Terms or the intermediate scheme. In that event, the same arbitrator can continue if all concerned agree.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Unlike institutional arbitration bodies, the LMAA is simply an association of arbitrators. It does not manage cases or monitor compliance. Once an arbitrator is appointed, the parties correspond with him or her directly and shoulder the responsibility for keeping to the timetable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Appointment_of_the_arbitrator\"><\/span>Appointment of the arbitrator<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>The regime contemplates a single decision\u2011maker. There is no roster; the participants are free to nominate anyone they trust, and many choose from the Association\u2019s list of Full Members or Aspiring Members. If one side asks the other to nominate an arbitrator and the parties agree on a name within two weeks, the claimant then has a further fortnight to pay the standard fee. When the parties cannot agree, either may write to the Honorary Secretary of the LMAA asking the President to make the appointment. The request should outline the dispute and the sort of expertise required but should not suggest particular individuals. After selecting a suitable person, the President sends the standard fee to the arbitrator and keeps the Association\u2019s administration charge.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In practice I often see parties opt for well\u2011known maritime lawyers or retired master mariners as arbitrators. Choosing a decision\u2011maker with experience in both charterparty law and maritime operations can smooth the process and reduce the likelihood of misunderstandings about industry practice. Because the LMAA does not supervise the process, it is wise to check the candidate\u2019s track record before appointment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"683\" src=\"https:\/\/danil-hristich.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/erik-starink-IiZIxyTwC0o-unsplash-1-1024x683.jpg\" alt=\"LMAA SCP Guidelines\" class=\"wp-image-4116\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/danil-hristich.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/erik-starink-IiZIxyTwC0o-unsplash-1-1024x683.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/danil-hristich.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/erik-starink-IiZIxyTwC0o-unsplash-1-900x600.jpg 900w, https:\/\/danil-hristich.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/erik-starink-IiZIxyTwC0o-unsplash-1-1536x1024.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/danil-hristich.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/erik-starink-IiZIxyTwC0o-unsplash-1-270x180.jpg 270w, https:\/\/danil-hristich.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/erik-starink-IiZIxyTwC0o-unsplash-1-770x515.jpg 770w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Costs_of_LMAA_Small_Claims_Arbitration\"><\/span>Costs of LMAA Small Claims Arbitration<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Fees are pre\u2011set and reviewed periodically by the Association\u2019s committee. At the time of writing, the standard charge is about \u00a35 000, and if the arbitrator is appointed through the LMAA an additional administration charge of roughly \u00a3450 applies. Where a cross\u2011demand exceeds the original claim and the arbitrator continues under the LMAA Small Claims Procedure, the respondent must pay an extra fixed amount (currently around \u00a33 000).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The standard fee compensates the arbitrator for accepting the case, reviewing correspondence and documents, and, if necessary, attending a short hearing and drafting the decision. It does not cover out\u2011of\u2011pocket expenses such as room hire, which the claimant pays upfront. If the tribunal is asked to determine a jurisdictional objection, additional remuneration may be requested. When a case ends early, the arbitrator must refund part of the fee, retaining only an amount proportionate to the work done.<br>The prevailing party ordinarily recovers the small claims fee and an allowance towards its legal costs, although the assessment of costs is at the arbitrator\u2019s discretion.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Recoverable legal expenses are capped at a figure set by the LMAA committee. As of early 2026, the limit is about \u00a36 000, or \u00a37 000 when a cross\u2011demand above the claim is pursued. Each side must provide a brief statement of costs within a week of the final submissions, but detailed invoices are not generally required.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Steps_in_LMAA_Small_Claims_Procedure_and_time_limits\"><\/span>Steps in LMAA Small Claims Procedure and time limits<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>The SCP favours brevity and efficiency. Disputes are resolved on the basis of written materials rather than testimony, and there are word limits and deadlines designed to keep matters on track. After the arbitrator\u2019s appointment is confirmed, the claimant has about two weeks to lodge its opening statement, which should be no longer than roughly two\u2011and\u2011a\u2011half thousand words and must be accompanied by all the documents on which the claimant relies. This document should set out the issues and the claimant\u2019s position clearly, using numbered paragraphs and exhibits.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Once the respondent receives the opening statement, it has four weeks to file its response and to raise any cross\u2011demand, each document being limited to about the same length. Should the respondent make a cross\u2011demand unrelated to the claim, it must pay the additional fee referred to above.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The claimant then has a further three\u2011week window to reply (using up to one thousand words) and, if necessary, to defend itself against the cross\u2011demand with a document of the same length to the original claim. Finally, the respondent may submit a short rejoinder within a fortnight, but only if the defence to the cross\u2011demand raises new issues. Any additional documents at this stage require the arbitrator\u2019s permission.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>If a party ignores the word limits or fails to support its argument with evidence, the arbitrator can insist on a compliant replacement. The timetable stops until the corrected version is filed. Missing a deadline without obtaining an extension can have serious consequences: the arbitrator may dismiss the claim for non\u2011service or decide the case on the basis of the material already provided. Costs incurred because a document was excessive or incomplete can be charged against the defaulting party.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Hearings_and_evidence\"><\/span>Hearings and evidence<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>This is largely a documents\u2011only process. The default assumption is that no hearing will take place, and a hearing will be convened only in unusual cases. Even then, the time available is capped at roughly five hours, divided equally between the parties. Independent expert opinions may be submitted, but only if the arbitrator agrees and subject to a strict word limit of two\u2011and\u2011a\u2011half thousand words.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>There is also no routine \u201cdisclosure\u201d phase. However, if it appears that a party is holding back relevant material, the arbitrator can order its production and may assume the missing material undermines that party\u2019s case if it is not supplied. For these purposes, \u201crelevant documents\u201d means anything bearing on the dispute, whether helpful or unhelpful to the party holding it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"684\" src=\"https:\/\/danil-hristich.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/vladimir-oprisko-jJ1dwjk6q44-unsplash-1024x684.jpg\" alt=\"LMAA Arbitration Guide\" class=\"wp-image-4120\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/danil-hristich.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/vladimir-oprisko-jJ1dwjk6q44-unsplash-1024x684.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/danil-hristich.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/vladimir-oprisko-jJ1dwjk6q44-unsplash-899x600.jpg 899w, https:\/\/danil-hristich.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/vladimir-oprisko-jJ1dwjk6q44-unsplash-1536x1025.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/danil-hristich.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/vladimir-oprisko-jJ1dwjk6q44-unsplash-270x180.jpg 270w, https:\/\/danil-hristich.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/vladimir-oprisko-jJ1dwjk6q44-unsplash-770x515.jpg 770w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Decision_and_avenues_for_challenge\"><\/span>Decision and avenues for challenge<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Once submissions have closed (and any oral session has concluded), the arbitrator endeavours to issue the decision within a month. The award is usually reasoned but cannot be appealed on a question of law. Parties may still contest the arbitrator\u2019s jurisdiction or raise complaints about serious procedural irregularity under sections\u00a067 and\u00a068 of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.legislation.gov.uk\/ukpga\/1996\/23\/contents\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Arbitration Act\u00a01996<\/a>, but these grounds are narrowly interpreted. The provision in section\u00a068 is intended to correct only fundamental failings; successful challenges to LMAA Small Claims Procedure awards are therefore rare.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Under the Arbitration Act 1996 and the SCP itself, the arbitrator may rectify clerical mistakes in the award or issue a memorandum explaining a particular point at the request of a party. Such applications must be made within four weeks of the award.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Flexibility_and_moving_to_other_rules\"><\/span>Flexibility and moving to other rules<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Although the SCP is designed for minor matters, the arbitrator has power to modify the procedure in unusual circumstances. If the dispute proves too complex or weighty for the LMAA Small Claims Procedure, the arbitrator may direct that it continue under the full LMAA Terms or the intermediate scheme. In that case, the same individual remains in charge as sole arbitrator. One important limitation is that the cap on recoverable costs cannot be increased without both parties\u2019 consent.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Observations_and_practical_tips\"><\/span>Observations and practical tips<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>In practice, arbitrators often interpret the word limits pragmatically. I have observed cases where an arbitrator allowed a party to exceed the limit by a small margin or accepted evidence filed with a reply, citing the overarching duty to deal with the case fairly. That said, parties should not rely on such indulgence. It is wiser to plan submissions carefully and seek the arbitrator\u2019s leave for any deviation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The LMAA Small Claims Procedure is intended to be a documents\u2011only procedure. If you believe an oral hearing is necessary \u2014 for example, to cross\u2011examine a witness or test expert evidence \u2014 you should raise this with the arbitrator as early as possible. Late requests are likely to be viewed as attempts to delay the reference and may be refused. Under the Second Schedule to the LMAA Terms, procedural applications should be made promptly; this principle applies equally to SCP cases.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Because the LMAA is an association rather than an institution, the quality and style of awards can vary depending on the arbitrator\u2019s background. Many LMAA members are experienced shipping practitioners rather than lawyers. This has advantages: they may understand commercial realities and the practicalities of maritime operations. However, it also means that awards may focus more on the merits than on legal analysis, and errors of law cannot easily be corrected because of the waiver of appeals. Parties should weigh this risk when agreeing to the SCP.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Finally, while the SCP is primarily designed for maritime disputes, there is nothing to prevent parties from using it in other types of cases. The procedure\u2019s speed, fixed costs and simplicity make it an attractive option for any low\u2011value contractual dispute where the parties are willing to forgo the extensive procedural safeguards of a full arbitration.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Conclusion\"><\/span>Conclusion<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>The LMAA Small Claims Procedure offers a streamlined and cost\u2011effective route to resolve disputes where the sums in issue are modest. Its fixed fees, concise submissions and absence of disclosure or hearings drastically reduce the time and expense involved compared with ordinary arbitration or litigation. For claims up to USD\u00a0100\u202f000 it is arguably one of the most efficient mechanisms available in London.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The flip side is that the scope for appeal is limited, and parties must accept that an error of law may go uncorrected. Those contemplating the SCP should therefore consider the trade\u2011off between speed and finality and ensure that the arbitration clause clearly sets out the desired procedure. As ever, careful drafting and timely procedural planning can make the difference between a swift, economical resolution and a drawn\u2011out dispute.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>If you require legal assistance or representation in an arbitration conducted under the LMAA Rules, please contact me by <a href=\"mailto:danil@danil-hristich.com\">email<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/t.me\/danilhristich\" target=\"_blank\">Telegram<\/a> or <a href=\"https:\/\/wa.me\/380632956265\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">WhatsApp<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\">\n{\n  \"@context\": \"https:\/\/schema.org\",\n  \"@type\": \"Article\",\n  \"headline\": \"LMAA Small Claims Procedure 2021 \\u2014 A Practitioner's Guide\",\n  \"description\": \"A practitioner's guide to the LMAA Small Claims Procedure 2021: scope, arbitrator appointment, word limits, costs, hearings, the award and section 68 challenges.\",\n  \"image\": [\n    \"https:\/\/danil-hristich.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/venti-views-tm_pBZ5UHiU-unsplash-scaled.jpg\"\n  ],\n  \"author\": {\n    \"@type\": \"Person\",\n    \"name\": \"Danil Hristich\",\n    \"jobTitle\": \"English Solicitor (England & Wales) and Ukrainian Advocate\",\n    \"url\": \"https:\/\/danil-hristich.com\/about\/\",\n    \"image\": \"https:\/\/danil-hristich.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/venti-views-tm_pBZ5UHiU-unsplash-scaled.jpg\",\n    \"sameAs\": [\n      \"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/danilhristich\/\",\n      \"https:\/\/t.me\/danilhristich\"\n    ]\n  },\n  \"publisher\": {\n    \"@type\": \"Person\",\n    \"name\": \"Danil Hristich\",\n    \"url\": \"https:\/\/danil-hristich.com\/\",\n    \"image\": \"https:\/\/danil-hristich.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/venti-views-tm_pBZ5UHiU-unsplash-scaled.jpg\"\n  },\n  \"datePublished\": \"2025-12-31T00:00:00+00:00\",\n  \"dateModified\": \"2026-04-25T00:00:00+00:00\",\n  \"inLanguage\": \"en\",\n  \"mainEntityOfPage\": {\n    \"@type\": \"WebPage\",\n    \"@id\": \"https:\/\/danil-hristich.com\/en\/lmaa-small-claims-procedure\/\"\n  },\n  \"url\": \"https:\/\/danil-hristich.com\/en\/lmaa-small-claims-procedure\/\",\n  \"isAccessibleForFree\": true,\n  \"associatedMedia\": {\n    \"@type\": \"DigitalDocument\",\n    \"name\": \"The LMAA Small Claims Procedure 2021 \\u2014 A Practitioner's Guide\",\n    \"url\": \"https:\/\/danil-hristich.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/LMAA-Small-Claims-Procedure-Practitioners-Guide-2026.pdf\",\n    \"encodingFormat\": \"application\/pdf\",\n    \"fileFormat\": \"application\/pdf\",\n    \"author\": {\n      \"@type\": \"Person\",\n      \"name\": \"Danil Hristich\"\n    },\n    \"isAccessibleForFree\": true,\n    \"inLanguage\": \"en\"\n  },\n  \"about\": [\n    {\n      \"@type\": \"Thing\",\n      \"name\": \"LMAA Small Claims Procedure 2021\"\n    },\n    {\n      \"@type\": \"Thing\",\n      \"name\": \"Maritime arbitration London\"\n    },\n    {\n      \"@type\": \"Thing\",\n      \"name\": \"Arbitration Act 1996\"\n    }\n  ],\n  \"keywords\": \"LMAA Small Claims Procedure, LMAA SCP 2021, LMAA arbitration, maritime arbitration London, demurrage, charterparty, Arbitration Act 1996 section 68\"\n}\n<\/script>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The London Maritime Arbitrators Association (LMAA) has developed several frameworks to resolve maritime disputes. Its flagship LMAA Terms provide a comprehensive set of rules for large and technically complex cases. The Intermediate Claims Procedure (ICP) fills the gap for claims up to around USD 400\u202f000, while the Small Claims Procedure (SCP) is designed to handle<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":4113,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false,"rank_math_title":"","rank_math_description":"","rank_math_focus_keyword":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[206,706,705,707,708,334],"class_list":{"0":"post-4133","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-main","8":"tag-arbitration-en","9":"tag-dispute-resolution-2","10":"tag-english-law-3","11":"tag-lmaa-scp-3","12":"tag-lmaa-small-claims-procedure-3","13":"tag-shipping-2"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/danil-hristich.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4133","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/danil-hristich.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/danil-hristich.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/danil-hristich.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/danil-hristich.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4133"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/danil-hristich.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4133\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5086,"href":"https:\/\/danil-hristich.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4133\/revisions\/5086"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/danil-hristich.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4113"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/danil-hristich.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4133"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/danil-hristich.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4133"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/danil-hristich.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4133"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}